Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp1jtDnp/PEANO_complete

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U21¹(tt, V1) → U22¹(isNat(activate(V1)))
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 0¹
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U12¹(tt, V2) → U13¹(isNat(activate(V2)))
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U21¹(tt, V1) → U22¹(isNat(activate(V1)))
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 0¹
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U12¹(tt, V2) → U13¹(isNat(activate(V2)))
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(ISNAT(x₁)) = x₁
POL(ISNATKIND(x₁)) = x₁
POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U11¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U12¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U21¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U31¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(U41¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__0) = 0
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U13(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U22(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
activate(X) → X
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 3 SCCs with 15 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation with max and min functions [25]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = x₁
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(ISNATKIND(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(n__0) = 0
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
activate(X) → X
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U13(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U22(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ AND

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                            ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [15] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its argument. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ AND

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

                            ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 1

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ AND

                            ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation with max and min functions [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ISNATKIND(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__0) = 1
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
activate(X) → X
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U13(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U22(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                          ↳ AND

                            ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDP

                              ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                ↳ QDP

                                  ↳ PisEmptyProof

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation with max and min functions [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ISNAT(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U21¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = 0
POL(n__0) = 1
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = 0
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
activate(X) → X
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U13(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U22(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(U41¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = 0
POL(n__0) = 1
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = 0
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
activate(X) → X
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U13(tt) → tt
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U22(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDPOrderProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.